Indian Heart Journal (Jan 2019)

Comparison of resting and adenosine-free pressure indices with adenosine-induced hyperemic fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions

  • Deep Chandh Raja,
  • Vijayakumar Subban,
  • Rony Mathew,
  • Jabir Abdullakutty,
  • Jo Joseph,
  • Jimmy George,
  • Subash Chandra,
  • Nandhini Livingston,
  • Shyam G. Nair,
  • Ezhilan Janakiraman,
  • Latchumanadhas Kalidoss,
  • Ajit Sankaradas Mullasari

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 71, no. 1
pp. 74 – 79

Abstract

Read online

Objective: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) using adenosine has been the gold standard in the functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses in the catheterization laboratory. We aim to study the correlation of adenosine-free indices such as whole cycle Pd/Pa [the ratio of mean distal coronary pressure (Pd) to the mean pressure observed in the aorta (Pa)], instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and contrast-induced submaximal hyperemia (cFFR) with FFR. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study included patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome (>48 h since onset) with discrete intermediate coronary lesions (40–70% diameter stenosis). All patients underwent assessment of whole cycle Pd/Pa, iFR, cFFR, and FFR. We then evaluated the correlation of these indices with FFR and assessed the diagnostic efficiencies of them against FFR ≤0.80. Results: Of the 103 patients from three different centers, 83 lesions were included for analysis. The correlation coefficient (r value) of whole cycle Pd/Pa, iFR, and cFFR in relation to FFR were +0.84, +0.77, and +0.70 (all p values < 0.001), respectively, and the c-statistic against FFR ≤0.80 were 0.92 (0.86–0.98), 0.89(0.81–0.97), and 0.91 (0.85–0.97) (all p values < 0.001), respectively. The best cut-off values identified by receiver–operator characteristic curve for whole cycle Pd/Pa, iFR, and cFFR were 0.94, 0.90, and 0.88, respectively, for an FFR ≤0.80. By the concept of “adenosine-free zone” (iFR = 0.86–0.93), 59% lesions in this study would not require adenosine. Conclusion: All the three adenosine-free indices had good correlation with FFR. There is no difference in the diagnostic accuracies among the indices in functional evaluation of discrete intermediate coronary stenoses. However, further validation is needed before adoption of adenosine-free pressure parameters into clinical practice. Keywords: Intermediate coronary stenosis, Fractional flow reserve, Instantaneous wave-free ratio, Whole cycle Pd/Pa, Contrast FFR