Environmental Research Letters (Jan 2024)

Balancing livestock production and environmental outcomes in northern Australia’s tropical savanna under global change

  • Rebecca K Runting,
  • Darran King,
  • Martin Nolan,
  • Javier Navarro,
  • Raymundo Marcos-Martinez,
  • Jonathan R Rhodes,
  • Lei Gao,
  • Ian Watson,
  • Andrew Ash,
  • April E Reside,
  • Jorge G Álvarez-Romero,
  • Jessie A Wells,
  • Euan G Ritchie,
  • Michalis Hadjikakou,
  • Don A Driscoll,
  • Jeffery D Connor,
  • Jonathan Garber,
  • Brett A Bryan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad6f2d
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 10
p. 104014

Abstract

Read online

Livestock production is an integral part of the global food system and the livelihoods of local people, but it also raises questions of environmental sustainability due to issues such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, biodiversity decline, land degradation, and water use. Further challenges to extensive livestock systems may arise from changes in climate and the global economy (particularly variation in prices for livestock and carbon). However, significant potential exists for both mitigating these impacts and adapting to change via altering stocking rates, managing fire, and supplementing cattle diets to reduce methane emissions. We developed an integrated, spatio-temporal modelling approach to assess the effectiveness of these options for land management in northern Australia’s tropical savanna under different global change scenarios. Performance was measured against a range of sustainability indicators, including environmental (GHG emissions, biodiversity, water intake, and land condition) and agricultural (profit, beef production) outcomes. Our model shows that maintaining historical stocking rates is not environmentally sustainable due to the accelerated land degradation exacerbated by a changing climate. However, planned early dry season burning substantially reduced emissions, and in our simulations was profitable under all global change scenarios that included a carbon price. Overall, the balance between production and environmental outcomes could be improved by stocking below modelled carrying capacity and implementing fire management. This management scenario was the most profitable (more than double the profit from maintaining historical stocking rates), prevented land degradation, and reduced GHG emissions by 23%. By integrating the cumulative impacts of climate change, external economic drivers, and management actions across a range of sustainability indicators, we show that the future of rangelands in Australia’s savannas has the potential to balance livestock production and environmental outcomes.

Keywords