JMIR Human Factors (Oct 2023)

Readiness for Change in the Implementation of a 3D Printing Initiative in a Catalan Tertiary Hospital Using the Normalization Process Theory: Survey Study

  • Francesc López Seguí,
  • Joan Cos Codina,
  • Laura Ricou Ríos,
  • María Isabel Martínez Segura,
  • Laura Miró Mezquita,
  • Raquel Escrich Navarro,
  • Meritxell Davins Riu,
  • Oriol Estrada Cuxart,
  • German Anashkin Kachalin,
  • Daniel Moreno-Martínez

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/47390
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10
p. e47390

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe high failure rate of innovation projects motivates us to understand the perceptions about resistances and barriers of the main stakeholders to improving success rates. ObjectiveThis study aims to analyze the readiness for change in the implementation of a 3D printing project in a Catalan tertiary hospital prior to its implementation. MethodsWe used a web-based, voluntary, and anonymous survey using the Normalization Measurement Development questionnaire (NoMAD) to gather views and perceptions from a selected group of health care professionals at Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital. ResultsIn this study, 58 professionals, including heads of service (n=30, 51%), doctors (n=18, 31%), nurses (n=7, 12%), and support staff (n=3, 5%), responded to the questionnaire. All groups saw the value of the project and were willing to enroll and support it. Respondents reported the highest scores (out of 5) in cognitive participation (mean 4.45, SD 0.04), coherence (mean 3.72, SD 0.13), and reflective monitoring (mean 3.80, SD 0.25). The weakest score was in collective action (mean 3.52, SD 0.12). There were no statistically significant differences in scores among professions in the survey. ConclusionsThe 3D printing project implementation should pay attention to preparing, defining, sharing, and supporting the operational work involved in its use and implementation. It should also understand, assess, and communicate the ways in which the new set of practices can affect the users and others around them. We suggest that health officers and politicians consider this experience as a solid ground toward the development of a more efficient health innovation system and as a catalyst for transformation.