Xin yixue (Oct 2022)

Clinical efficacy of vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel disease

  • Liu Sixue, Zhong Wa, Lin Ying, Xia Zhongsheng, Zhong Yingqiang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-9802.2022.10.012
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 53, no. 10
pp. 767 – 773

Abstract

Read online

Objective To assess clinical efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) and analyze whether VDZ combined with immunomodulator and/or corticosteroids can achieve better outcomes. Methods Twenty-nine patients with active IBD including 21 cases of ulcerative colitis (UC) and 8 cases of Crohn’s disease (CD) were recruited. They were assigned to receive VDZ (at a dose of 300 mg) intravenously at 0, 2, 6 weeks as induction therapy and every 8 or 4 weeks as maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was clinical response at week 14/22, while the secondary endpoints were clinical remission and mucosal healing at week 54 (VDZ administration every 8 weeks) or week 30 (VDZ administration every 4 weeks). Based on the concomitant medications, all patients were divided into the VDZ monotherapy and combination groups (VDZ combined with immunomodulator and/or corticosteroids). The therapeutic effect was compared between two groups. Results Among UC patients,clinical response and endoscopic remission rates at week 14/22 were 81% (13/16) and 63% (10/16), respectively. At week 54, clinical remission rate was 80% (4/5)and mucosal healing rate was 40% (2/5). Among CD patients, clinical response rates at week 14/22 and week 30 were 75% (6/8) and 100% (1/1), respectively. There was no significant difference in clinical response rate at week 14/22 between the VDZ monotherapy and combination groups. Conclusions VDZ is an effective biologic agent as induction and maintenance therapy for UC and CD. VDZ combined with immunomodulator and/or corticosteroids brings no additional benefit in the induction therapy. Therefore, VDZ monotherapy may be a better choice in clinical practice.

Keywords