APPLICATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN LEGAL COMPARISON: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Abstract

It is not yet true that many countries have used this restorative concept as an alternative cause of settlement. It is dependent on the laws and policies of every country. Indonesia as a civil law and American civil law arbiter would indirectly see the difference in both material and formal applications in criminal justice. However, the rupiah still had a chance to strengthen to Rp 9,100 per dollar, he said. The approach involves the statue approach (statue approach), and using a comparative approach (approach approach). Additionally, the author USES primary and secondary legal material as a guide in outlining problems. The difference between the implementation of active justice in Indonesia and America can be seen from the implementation of restorative justice itself, whereas in America only certain states apply restorative justice, and so far only 45 states apply restorative justice. The implementation of restorative justice between Indonesia and America however different the legal system certainly has similarities and differences.

Keywords

• restorative justice
• united states
• indonesia
• comparison
• laws