Environmental DNA (Jan 2021)

Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding and underwater visual census to monitor tropical reef fishes

  • Andrea Polanco Fernández,
  • Virginie Marques,
  • Fabian Fopp,
  • Jean‐Baptiste Juhel,
  • Giomar Helena Borrero‐Pérez,
  • Marie‐Charlotte Cheutin,
  • Tony Dejean,
  • Juan David González Corredor,
  • Andrés Acosta‐Chaparro,
  • Régis Hocdé,
  • David Eme,
  • Eva Maire,
  • Manuel Spescha,
  • Alice Valentini,
  • Stéphanie Manel,
  • David Mouillot,
  • Camille Albouy,
  • Loïc Pellissier

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.140
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 1
pp. 142 – 156

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a revolutionary method to monitor marine biodiversity from animal DNA traces. Examining the capacity of eDNA to provide accurate biodiversity measures in species‐rich ecosystems such as coral reefs is a prerequisite for their application in long‐term monitoring. Here, we surveyed two Colombian tropical marine reefs, the island of Providencia and Gayraca Bay near Santa Marta, using eDNA and underwater visual census (UVC) methods. We collected a large quantity of surface water (30 L per filter) above the reefs and applied a metabarcoding protocol using three different primer sets targeting the 12S mitochondrial DNA, which are specific to the vertebrates Actinopterygii and Elasmobranchii. By assigning eDNA sequences to species using a public reference database, we detected the presence of 107 and 85 fish species, 106 and 92 genera, and 73 and 57 families in Providencia and Gayraca Bay, respectively. Of the species identified using eDNA, 32.7% (Providencia) and 18.8% (Gayraca) were also found in the UVCs. We further found congruence in genus and species richness and abundance between eDNA and UVC approaches in Providencia but not in Gayraca Bay. Mismatches between eDNA and UVC had a phylogenetic and ecological signal, with eDNA detecting a broader phylogenetic diversity and more effectively detecting smaller species, pelagic species and those in deeper habitats. Altogether, eDNA can be used for fast and broad biodiversity surveys and is applicable to species‐rich ecosystems in the tropics, but improved coverage of the reference database is required before this new method could serve as an effective complement to traditional census methods.

Keywords