Медицинский совет (Jan 2022)

Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of original and generic meloxicam in the treatment of acute neck pain

  • E. V. Yakovlev,
  • E. N. Gnevyshev,
  • S. A. Zhivolupov,
  • A. A. Smirnov,
  • Yu. A. Zhivolupova,
  • A. I. Eriskovskaya,
  • A. L. Ovsepyan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2021-21-1-25-33
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 0, no. 21-1
pp. 25 – 33

Abstract

Read online

Introduction. In the structure of the global burden of diseases, back pain ranks first in the world in the list of causes of disability. Neck pain is one of the most common diseases of the musculoskeletal system. An integral part of the strategy for the treatment of acute neck pain is the use of original nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with high proven effectiveness.Objective. To conduct a comparative analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of the original drug meloxicam (Movalis) and its generic (Amelotex) in the treatment of patients with acute nonspecific musculoskeletal pain of cervical localization.Materials and methods. The article provides an assessment of the therapeutic effectiveness of the original drug meloxicam (Movalis) and its generic (Amelotex) in the treatment of patients with acute neck pain. Comparative analysis of the results of treatment of 108 patients hospitalized in the Branch of the MC JSC “Admiralteyskie Verfi” aged 18 to 60 years (58 men and 50 women) with a diagnosis of acute dorsalgia of cervical localization (M54.2 according to ICD-10). The average age of patients is 42.5 ± 11.1 years.Results. As a result of the clinical and neurological study and statistical processing of the data obtained, it was found that the use of Movalis in the treatment of patients with acute neck pain was more effective compared to the use of generic (Amelotex). In the Movalis group, the level of pain intensity and the index of disability after treatment was significantly lower than in the Amelotex group at an equivalent dose of 15 mg per day (p < 0.01). The analgesic effect in the group of patients receiving Movalis was longer. There was a significant decrease in sleep disorders associated with pain syndrome in the group (Movalis) compared with patients of the second group (Amelotex). Conclusions. The absence of therapeutic bioequivalence between Movalis and Amelotex revealed in our study determines the relevance of the choice of drugs for the complex therapy of patients of this profile. A multimodal approach to the strategy of treating neck pain, individually patient-oriented, including the use of effective and safe medicines, physical exercises, manual therapy, is optimal.>< 0.01). The analgesic effect in the group of patients receiving Movalis was longer. There was a significant decrease in sleep disorders associated with pain syndrome in the group (Movalis) compared with patients of the second group (Amelotex).Conclusions. The absence of therapeutic bioequivalence between Movalis and Amelotex revealed in our study determines the relevance of the choice of drugs for the complex therapy of patients of this profile. A multimodal approach to the strategy of treating neck pain, individually patient-oriented, including the use of effective and safe medicines, physical exercises, manual therapy, is optimal.

Keywords