Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (Jun 2022)

Considerations for Sex-Cognizant Research in Exercise Biology and Medicine

  • Samia M. O'Bryan,
  • Samia M. O'Bryan,
  • Kathleen R. Connor,
  • Devin J. Drummer,
  • Devin J. Drummer,
  • Kaleen M. Lavin,
  • Marcas M. Bamman,
  • Marcas M. Bamman,
  • Marcas M. Bamman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.903992
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4

Abstract

Read online

As the fields of kinesiology, exercise science, and human movement developed, the majority of the research focused on male physiology and extrapolated findings to females. In the medical sphere, basing practice on data developed in only males resulted in the removal of drugs from the market in the late 1990s due to severe side effects (some life-threatening) in females that were not observed in males. In response to substantial evidence demonstrating exercise-induced health benefits, exercise is often promoted as a key modality in disease prevention, management, and rehabilitation. However, much like the early days of drug development, a historical literature knowledge base of predominantly male studies may leave the exercise field vulnerable to overlooking potentially key biological differences in males and females that may be important to consider in prescribing exercise (e.g., how exercise responses may differ between sexes and whether there are optimal approaches to consider for females that differ from conventional approaches that are based on male physiology). Thus, this review will discuss anatomical, physiological, and skeletal muscle molecular differences that may contribute to sex differences in exercise responses, as well as clinical considerations based on this knowledge in athletic and general populations over the continuum of age. Finally, this review summarizes the current gaps in knowledge, highlights the areas ripe for future research, and considerations for sex-cognizant research in exercise fields.

Keywords