Acta Ortopédica Brasileira (Jan 2022)

DOES ULNA FIXATION ALTER THE OUTCOME FOR DISTAL-THIRD FOREARM FRACTURES IN CHILDREN?

  • JONATAS BRITO DE ALENCAR NETO,
  • AMANDA PROGÊNIO DOS SANTOS,
  • GUTHIERREZ VICTOR DE ABREU BEZERRA,
  • LUIZ HOLANDA PINTO NETO,
  • MARIA LUZETE COSTA CAVALCANTE

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220223001e250848
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 30, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT Introduction Fractures of the distal third of the forearm are common in the pediatric population. Conservative treatment of an ipsilateral fracture of the distal ulna metaphysis is one of the risk factors for loss of reduction. Percutaneous fixation of the fracture with K-wires is recommended. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous fixation of both bones performed as the primary treatment. Materials and Methods A randomized, open, prospective, clinical trial was conducted, including skeletally immature patients who underwent surgery for fractures of the distal radius and ulna. They were randomized into two groups, one with fixation only of the radius fracture and the other with fixation of both the radius and the ulna fractures, and they were followed clinically and radiologically for up to 12 weeks postoperatively. Results Sixteen children were selected. In the intraoperative period, fluoroscopy was activated for a longer time when fixing the ulna (p = 0.011) and the surgical time was longer in this group (p = 0.014). In the postoperative evaluations, the group whose surgery involved the fixation of both bones had a lower postoperative pain score (p <0.001) and less time away from school (p <0.001). Conclusions In this study, postoperative pain and absence from school were both less when fixation of the radius and ulna was performed. Evidence Level II; Randomized Controlled Study.

Keywords