Emerging Infectious Diseases (Jul 2019)

Prescribing Patterns for Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex and M. xenopi Pulmonary Disease in Ontario, Canada, 2001–2013

  • Sarah K. Brode,
  • Hannah Chung,
  • Michael A. Campitelli,
  • Jeffrey C. Kwong,
  • Alex Marchand-Austin,
  • Kevin L. Winthrop,
  • Frances B. Jamieson,
  • Theodore K. Marras

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2507.181817
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 7
pp. 1271 – 1280

Abstract

Read online

Surveys suggest that clinicians diverge from guidelines when treating Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease (PD). To determine prescribing patterns, we conducted a cohort study of adults >66 years of age in Ontario, Canada, with MAC or Mycobacterium xenopi PD during 2001–2013. Using linked laboratory and health administrative databases, we studied the first treatment episode (>60 continuous days of >1 of a macrolide, ethambutol, rifamycin, fluoroquinolone, linezolid, inhaled amikacin, or, for M. xenopi, isoniazid). Treatment was prescribed for 24% MAC and 15% of M. xenopi PD patients. Most commonly prescribed was the recommended combination of macrolide, ethambutol, and rifamycin, for 47% of MAC and 36% of M. xenopi PD patients. Among MAC PD patients, 20% received macrolide monotherapy and 33% received regimens associated with emergent macrolide resistance. Although the most commonly prescribed regimen was guidelines-recommended, many regimens prescribed for MAC PD were associated with emergent macrolide resistance.

Keywords