Applied Sciences (Aug 2024)

Incidental Findings in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Case–Control Study

  • Ioanna Pouliezou,
  • Angeliki Xenou,
  • Anastasia Mitsea,
  • Nikolaos Christoloukas,
  • Kyriaki Briamatou,
  • Iordanis Konstantinidis,
  • Dimitrios G. Goulis,
  • Iosif Sifakakis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156772
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 15
p. 6772

Abstract

Read online

Incidental findings (IFs) depicted in imaging tests during the diagnostic evaluation of patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) can guide clinicians during treatment planning procedures for effective, comprehensive cleft care. Evidence regarding IFs in different anatomical regions distant from the dentition is scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of IFs in various anatomical areas between patients with non-syndromic CL/P and unaffected subjects. Orthopantomographs (OPTs), lateral cephalometric (LC) radiographs, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 120 subjects (case group: n = 40, 18 females, age 14.5 ± 5.0 years; control group: n = 80, 36 females, age 14.6 ± 4.9 years) were examined, and IFs were assessed by four observers. A significantly higher prevalence of IFs (p < 0.001) was reported in the case group (97.5%) compared with the control group (62.5%). The most prevalent location of IFs in the case group was the maxilla (92.5%), followed by the nasal cavity (75.8%) and the mandible (63.2%), while in the control group, the highest rates of IFs occurred in the maxilla (43.8%), mandible (41.3%), and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (14.7%). No gender-dependent pattern for IF occurrence was detected overall. Orofacial clefts may affect the mandible. However, the reported IFs were limited compared to those in the maxilla. In conclusion, individuals with CL/P are more likely to present with a range of IFs than their unaffected peers. Understanding the association between CL/P and IFs is critical for successful interdisciplinary treatment, raising awareness of the potential need for future dental care for cleft patients, and managing extra-dental aberrations. A systematic assessment of diagnostic records is required to eliminate the risk of overlooking clinically significant IFs.

Keywords