PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Evaluation of primary health care by users during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

  • Suely Deysny de Matos Celino,
  • Nailton José Brandão de Albuquerque Filho,
  • Monalisa da Nóbrega Cesarino Gomes,
  • Gabriela Maria Cavalcanti Costa,
  • Ana Elza Oliveira de Mendonça

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292039
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 9
p. e0292039

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveTo evaluate the primary health care (PHC) attributes and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic using the perspective of users.MethodsThis cross-sectional, quantitative study included 422 PHC users from 96 Family Health Teams in a city in Brazil. The assessment used the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) and a structured questionnaire on the sociodemographic and epidemiological characteristics of users and basic health units (BHU). The Person's chi-square test was used to analyze the association between high overall scores in PCATool and characteristics of users and BHU. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) with a 95% confidence interval were also calculated. Poisson regression and Rao Scott's Chi-square test were used to estimate crude PR.ResultsMost users were aged 30 to 39 years (26.3%), women (75.4%), registered at the BHU for over ten years (59.5%), and had incomplete secondary education (30.6%). The mean of PHC essential attributes and overall scores were low (6.10 ± 0.81 and 5.78 ± 0.77, respectively). "First-contact care-use" received the highest score (9.22 ± 1.62), while "first-contact care-accessibility" received the lowest (2.82 ± 0.90). High overall scores were associated with an average employment time of professionals (doctors and nurses) at the BHU (PR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.17-1.48; p Conclusion"First-contact care-use" was the best evaluated, while "first-contact care-accessibility" was the worst. High scores were associated with a lower educational level of users and BHU with more experienced professionals.