North American Spine Society Journal (Sep 2024)
Facet joint loading after 1-, 2- and 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty: a comparison of spiked versus keeled baseplates
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to examine facet contact forces above, below, and at surgical index levels induced by artificial disc implantation and compare the results from spiked versus keeled baseplates comprising the arthroplasty device. Methods: Human specimens from C2 to C7 were subjected to flexion, extension, and lateral bending prior to, and following random allocation to spiked or keeled cervical arthroplasty at the index (C5-C6), inferior (C6-C7), and superior (C4-C5) levels. Thin film force sensors were inserted unilaterally into the corresponding facets prior to intact testing. Force data was normalized to the minimum forces recorded during each loading mode under each condition, reported as (Max/Min) force ratio and subjected to a 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post-hoc tests for comparison to intact specimens. Results: Under flexion, compared to intact, all levels displayed a significant reduction in force ratio following a 1- and 3-level implantation for the spiked baseplate device. An increase in force ratio was observed at the index level for a 2-level implantation but was mitigated with the completion of a superior device insertion. No statistical differences were noted for keeled devices. In extension, the spiked baseplate device reduced the force ratio for 1- and 2-level implantations. A 3-level insertion did not alter facet force ratios. For the keeled device, no statistical changes were noted. Lateral bending associated with spiked devices resulted in statistically reduced or nonsignificant changes in facet loading ratios. The keeled devices did not display significant changes to facet force ratios. Conclusions: Implantation of multilevel disc devices can reduce or sustain unaltered facet loading conditions. In general, 3-level arthroplasty statistically reduced or does not increase facet force ratios compared to intact values. The use of spiked versus keel device baseplates is a clinical selection involving anterior/posterior placement and endplate degeneration conditions.
