Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine (Oct 2024)

A Retrospective Analysis of Late Open Conversions Following Failed Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

  • Bahadır Aytekin,
  • Bekir Boğaçhan Akkaya,
  • Hayrettin Levent Mavioğlu,
  • Hakkı Zafer İşcan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2510363
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 10
p. 363

Abstract

Read online

Background: The incidence of late open surgical conversions (OSCs) has recently increased. Vascular surgeons face additional technical challenges in late conversion surgery of failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) due to the presence of a previously deployed endograft. Based on our institutional experience, this study aimed to delineate methods to improve late open conversion outcomes, proposing solutions for technical challenges. Methods: All preoperative OSC data on failed EVARs operated in our Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic between January 2017 and January 2024 were evaluated retrospectively. Study endpoints included early (30-day or in-hospital) and late follow-up outcomes. Early outcomes included perioperative mortality and morbidities, intensive care unit (ICU) period, and length of hospital stay (LOS). The main outcome of interest during follow-up was overall survival. Results: Sixteen patients in our hospital, comprising eight elective and eight emergency procedures, underwent OSCs following EVAR. The difference between the 30-day mortality rates for the elective and urgent late conversions was significant (p < 0.001). Of these patients, 15 were male, with a mean age of 70.8 years (range: 62–80). Preoperative cardiac shock status and low hematocrit level (<20%) were independent mortality factors (p < 0.001). The ICU period was 8.7 ± 5.3 days (2–20 days) on average, and LOS was 17.3 ± 8.4 (6–29 days) days on average. The mean time to open surgical conversion in this cohort was 44.4 ± 16.8 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 43.75%. Conclusions: The incidence of open surgical conversion is notably growing. Emergent open surgical conversions exhibit poorer mortality outcomes compared to elective procedures. Further data are essential to evaluate the ramifications of expanding the use of EVAR beyond the instructions for use (IFU) guidelines. The procedures involving patients who challenge the IFU criteria should be conducted at experienced centers and require close monitoring. Open surgical repair (OSR) as the initial treatment opportunity could be an alternative strategy for improving outcomes in this patient cohort.

Keywords