Asian Journal of Surgery (May 2023)

Clinical assessment for non-reversal stoma and stoma re-creation after reversal surgery for patients with rectal cancer having undergoing sphincter-saving operation

  • Chih-Yu Kuo,
  • Yen-Kuang Lin,
  • Po-Li Wei,
  • James Chi-Yong Ngu,
  • Kuan-Der Lee,
  • Chi-Long Chen,
  • Yaoru Huang,
  • Chia-Che Chen,
  • Li-Jen Kuo

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 46, no. 5
pp. 1944 – 1950

Abstract

Read online

Background: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for permanent stoma (PS) in patients who underwent sphincter-saving operations for rectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 597 consecutive patients with rectal cancer from January 2012 to December 2020 at Taipei Medical University Hospital. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to analyze risk factors for PS. Results: After a mean follow-up of 47.3 months (range 7–114 months), 59 patients (15.1%) were alive with a PS, including 46 patients who did not undergo reversal surgery and 13 patients who underwent stoma re-creation after reversal surgery. The mean period between primary surgery and stoma reversal was 6.0 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for PS were local recurrence [odd ratio (OR), 25.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.428–147.761; p 999; p 999; p < 0.001], perineural invasion [OR, 4.782; 95% CI, 1.22–18.736; p = 0.025], and operation time (min) [OR, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.002–1.014; p = 0.01]. Conclusions: Local recurrence, perirectal abscess, anastomosis site stenosis, perineural invasion, and operation time were independent risk factors for PS. Therefore, before a patient undergoes surgery for rectal cancer, surgeons should consider the possibility of the need for a PS, and patients should be informed before the operation that closure of the temporary stoma may not always be possible.

Keywords