Scientific Reports (Aug 2024)

Rock slope stability analysis of a limestone quarry in a case study of a National Cement Factory in Eastern Ethiopia

  • Getaneh Bezie,
  • Endalu Tadele Chala,
  • Nagessa Zerihun Jilo,
  • Sisay Birhanu,
  • Kalkidan Kefale Berta,
  • Siraj Mulugeta Assefa,
  • Biruk Gissila

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69196-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 26

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Rock slope failures pose significant challenges in geotechnical engineering due to the intricate nature of rock masses, discontinuities, and various destabilizing factors during and after excavation. In mining industries, such as national cement factories, multi-benched excavation systems are commonly used for quarrying. However, cut slopes are often designed with steep angles to maximize economic benefits, inadvertently neglecting critical slope stability issues. This oversight can lead to slope instability, endangering human lives and property. This study focuses on analyzing the stability of existing quarry cut slopes, estimating their final depth, and conducting a parametric study of geometric profiles including bench height, width, face angle, and rump width. Kinematic analysis helps identify potential failure modes. The results reveal that the existing quarry cut slope is prone to toppling, wedge failure, and planar failure with probabilities of 42.68%, 19.53%, and 14.23%, respectively. Numerical modeling using the finite element method (Phase2 8.0 software) was performed under both static and dynamic loading conditions. The shear reduction factor (SRF) of the existing quarry cut slope was 1.01 under static loading and 0.86 under dynamic loading. Similarly, for the estimated depth, the SRF was 0.82 under static loading and 0.7 under dynamic loading. These values indicate that the slope stability falls significantly below the minimum acceptable SRF, rendering it unstable. The parametric study highlights the face angle of the bench as the most influential parameter in slope stability. By adjusting the bench face angle from 90° to 75°, 70°, and 65°, the SRF increased by 31.6%, 35.4%, and 37.9%, respectively. Among these, a 70° bench face angle is recommended for optimal stability with a SRF of 1.27 under static loading and 1.18 under dynamic loading.

Keywords