Haematologica (Nov 2016)

A prospective randomized trial comparing cyclosporine/methotrexate and tacrolimus/sirolimus as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

  • Johan Törlén,
  • Olle Ringdén,
  • Karin Garming-Legert,
  • Per Ljungman,
  • Jacek Winiarski,
  • Kari Remes,
  • Maija Itälä-Remes,
  • Mats Remberger,
  • Jonas Mattsson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.149294
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 101, no. 11

Abstract

Read online

Improvement of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis remains an important goal in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Based on reports of possibly preferential properties of sirolimus, we compared the standard regimen of cyclosporine and methotrexate (n=106) with a combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus (n=103) as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a prospective, open, randomized trial. The hypothesis was that the tacrolimus/sirolimus regimen would lead to less acute graft-versus-host disease and reduced transplant-related mortality. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease of grades II–IV (41% vs. 51%; P=0.19) or grades III–IV (13% vs. 7%; P=0.09) between the groups. Time to neutrophil engraftment (18 days vs. 17 days; P=0.24) was similar, but time to platelet engraftment was longer in cyclosporine/methotrexate patients (14 vs. 12 days; P