Dynamic changes in macrophage polarization during the resolution phase of periodontal disease

Abstract

Abstract Aim Polarization of macrophages (Mφ) is a well‐controlled axis with considerable consequences in both the pro‐inflammatory and resolution phases of inflammation. We aimed to determine if periodontal therapy may instigate M1 to M2 Mφ polarization favoring resolution of inflammation within periodontal tissues. Methods Gingival biopsies were excised from subjects diagnosed with Stage III, Grade B periodontitis before and 4–6 weeks after nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Total RNA was isolated and pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory markers associated with Mφ polarization assessed by RT‐qPCR. Mice were subject to ligature‐induced periodontitis and gingival tissues collected after 8 days in‐situ or 10 days after ligature removal and M1 and M2 Mφ markers examined by RT‐qPCR and flow cytometry. Results In human samples, improvement in clinical parameters posttherapy correlates with reduced bacterial burden, downregulation in M1 (TNF‐α, STAT1, CXCL10, and miR‐155), and elevated levels of M2 (STAT6, TGM2, CCL22, and IL‐10) Mφ markers. In a murine model of resolution of LIP, we observed reduced levels of M1 Mφ markers cox2, iNOS2, F4/80+CD80+, and F4/80+CD86+ and elevated levels of M2‐like Mφ markers tgm2, arg1, F4/80+CD206+ and F4/80+CD163+ corroborated human findings. Conclusion Resolution of periodontal inflammation is associated with M1 to M2 Mφ polarization after nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Assessment of Mφ markers can provide relevant clinical information on the successful response of periodontal therapy and may be used to target nonresponders.

Keywords

• macrophage
• nonsurgical periodontal therapy
• periodontal disease
• polarization
• resolution of inflammation