Evidence-Based Strategies for Warm Compress Therapy in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Abstract

Abstract Aim Despite promising results from technological therapies like intense pulsed light application, warm compress therapy is a mainstay in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). However, applying warm compresses (WC) to the eyelids is palliative rather than curative and not always dispensed with specific instructions. The range of eyelid warming treatments available and lack of clear directives for use creates uncertainty for patients accustomed to explicit dosage information. This report examines data from clinical studies across the past 20 years to identify effective protocols for three types of WC—hot towel, microwavable eye mask, and self-heating eye mask (EM). Method Literature search for studies on WC and MGD published between 2004 and 2023 in English was conducted. Studies wherein hot towel, microwavable EM, and self-heating EM were used in a treatment arm were included and those wherein they served only as control or were used in conjunction with another intervention were excluded. 20 resulting studies were separated into 3 groups: 5 on temperature profiles of WC, 6 with single application of WC, and 9 with repeated applications. Study methods and outcomes were tabulated, and a qualitative review was performed, attending to WC protocol and efficacy, as indicated by measures of tear film, meibomian gland health, and dry eye questionnaires. Results Data from the aforementioned studies revealed that each method can achieve target eyelid temperature of 40 °C. A single application of WC—ranging from 5 to 20 min—can significantly improve tear quality, while repeated applications significantly relieve symptoms associated with dry eyes from MGD and, in most studies, significantly improve meibomian gland health. Hot towels, however, require frequent reheating to maintain eyelid temperatures above 40 °C, rendering them relatively ineffective in longitudinal studies. Microwavable EM retain heat well across 10 min and were found to improve tear break-up time and/or meibomian gland score. Self-heating EM have variable activation times and were typically applied for longer periods, showing benefits akin to microwavable EM in short-term studies. Studies monitoring compliance indicate greater deviation from protocol with higher application frequencies or longer-term use. Evidence suggests superior heat retention and therapeutic effects on specific contributing factors in MGD (such as Demodex) with moist–heat compress. Conclusion Considering decreased patience adherence to therapy with increased usage frequencies, and balancing needs to provide succinct instructions for various compress types, an advisable strategy is for patients to apply a moist–heat generating EM (microwavable or self-heating) to each eye for at least 10 min, prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Keywords

• Meibomian gland dysfunction
• Evaporative dry eye
• Warm compress
• Eyelid warming therapy