Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (Aug 2024)

Can clinicians identify community-acquired pneumonia on ultralow-dose CT? A diagnostic accuracy study

  • Anne Heltborg,
  • Christian Backer Mogensen,
  • Helene Skjøt-Arkil,
  • Matthias Giebner,
  • Ayham Al-Masri,
  • Usha Bc Khatry,
  • Sangam Khatry,
  • Ina Isabell Kathleen Heinemeier,
  • Jonas Jannick Andreasen,
  • Sanne Sarmila Sivalingam Hariesh,
  • Tenna Termansen,
  • Anna Natalie Kolnes,
  • Morten Hjarnø Lorentzen,
  • Christian Borbjerg Laursen,
  • Stefan Posth,
  • Michael Brun Andersen,
  • Bo Mussmann,
  • Camilla Stræde Spile,
  • Ole Graumann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01242-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 32, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Without increasing radiation exposure, ultralow-dose computed tomography (CT) of the chest provides improved diagnostic accuracy of radiological pneumonia diagnosis compared to a chest radiograph. Yet, radiologist resources to rapidly report the chest CTs are limited. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of emergency clinicians’ assessments of chest ultralow-dose CTs for community-acquired pneumonia using a radiologist’s assessments as reference standard. Methods This was a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Ten emergency department clinicians (five junior clinicians, five consultants) assessed chest ultralow-dose CTs from acutely hospitalised patients suspected of having community-acquired pneumonia. Before assessments, the clinicians attended a focused training course on assessing ultralow-dose CTs for pneumonia. The reference standard was the assessment by an experienced emergency department radiologist. Primary outcome was the presence or absence of pulmonary opacities consistent with community-acquired pneumonia. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using generalised estimating equations. Results All clinicians assessed 128 ultralow-dose CTs. The prevalence of findings consistent with community-acquired pneumonia was 56%. Seventy-eight percent of the clinicians’ CT assessments matched the reference assessment. Diagnostic accuracy estimates were: sensitivity = 83% (95%CI: 77–88), specificity = 70% (95%CI: 59–81), positive predictive value = 80% (95%CI: 74–84), negative predictive value = 78% (95%CI: 73–82). Conclusion This study found that clinicians could assess chest ultralow-dose CTs for community-acquired pneumonia with high diagnostic accuracy. A higher level of clinical experience was not associated with better diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords