Horticulturae (Jan 2024)

Influence of Plasma-Activated Water on Foliar and Fruit Micronutrient Content and Plant Protection Efficiency

  • Andrei I. Kuzin,
  • Natalia Ya. Kashirskaya,
  • Alexei E. Solovchenko,
  • Anna M. Kochkina,
  • Ludmila V. Stepantsowa,
  • Vyacheslav N. Krasin,
  • Evgeny M. Konchekov,
  • Vladimir I. Lukanin,
  • Konstantin F. Sergeichev,
  • Victoria V. Gudkova,
  • Dmitry O. Khort,
  • Igor G. Smirnov

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10010055
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
p. 55

Abstract

Read online

Foliar fertilizing is very important to supply apple plants with calcium and micronutrients. The most cost-effective approach to this is the application of the fertilizers in tank mixtures with plant protection chemicals. Plasma-activated water (PAW) has great potential for the use in the agriculture. We used two type of PAWs, PAW1 (made using underwater electrical discharge in an aqueous KNO3 solution and includes reactive nitrogen species and platinum nanoparticles) and PAW2 (made using a plasma torch with nitrogen gas makeup and contains reactive nitrogen species but not metals). We studied the impact of two PAW types on the contents of Ca, B, Mn, Fe, and Co in leaves and Ca, Mn, Fe, Zn, and Mo in fruits sprayed with tank mixtures containing the fertilizers. We also tested the efficiency of PAW in the control of apple scab when applied as tank mixtures with plant protection chemicals. The application of the PAWs significantly increased foliar Ca when the PAW was mixed with Ca-containing formulations (spraying PAW1 containing Ca increased leaf Ca by up to 21%, and PAW2 up by to 9% compared to Ca spraying without PAW). The largest fruit Ca increase was in the variant treated with PAW1 with a micronutrient spraying program (up to 143%). The PAW treatments enhanced the baseline mineral contents of the plants even when they were not sprayed with the nutrients. PAW1 mainly increased the nutrient contents of the apple fruits. PAWs have proven to be efficient for the control of apple scab, thereby reducing the demand for fungicides. The scab damage to the leaves and fruits was similar in plants treated with PAWs without fungicides (1.7–1.9% on the leaves and 1.6–1.8% on the fruits) compared to the conventional chemical scab control (0.9% leaves and 0.6% fruits) and was significantly lower than in the untreated control (9.3% on leaves and 11.9 on fruits).

Keywords