Evaluation of agreement in macular vascular density measured by different protocols: 4.5 mm × 4.5 mm and 6 mm × 6 mm

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement in the macular vascular density (MVD) measured by two protocols: 4.5 mm × 4.5 mm and 6 mm × 6 mm. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Methods: Healthy volunteers between the age group of 19 and 39 years were recruited. Topcon DRI OCT Triton plus (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to acquire the fovea-centered optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) image using two protocols: 4.5 mm × 4.5 mm and 6 mm × 6 mm. MVD was measured by the manufacturer software in the superficial capillary plexus slab in five regions: central, superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal subfields of early treatment diabetic retinopathy study grid in each protocol. Results: The study included 79 eyes of 40 healthy volunteers. The difference in the mean MVD between two protocols was 3.84% in right eye and 4.2% in left eye in central subfield, 0.93% in right eye and 1.13% in left eye in superior subfield, 0.06% in right eye and 1.45% in left eye in nasal subfield, 1.65% in right eye and 0.7% in left eye in inferior subfield, 0.4% in right eye and 0.54% in left eye in temporal subfield. The measurements were significantly higher in 6 mm × 6 mm in central subfield in both the eyes and in nasal field in the left eye. Whereas, the measurements were significantly higher in 4.5 mm × 4.5 mm in superior and inferior subfield in both the eyes and in temporal subfield in the left eye. Conclusion: The protocols should not be used interchangeably and it is necessary to include recommendation of the field of view to measure MVD while standardizing OCTA reporting.

Keywords

• 4.5 mm × 4.5 mm
• 6 mm × 6 mm
• macular vascular density
• optical coherence tomography angiography