Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (Jun 2023)

A systematic review of hemorrhage and vascular injuries in civilian public mass shootings

  • Karolina Nyberger,
  • Lovisa Strömmer,
  • Carl-Magnus Wahlgren

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01093-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 31, no. 1
pp. 1 – 21

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Civilian public mass shootings (CPMSs) are a major public health issue and in recent years several events have occurred worldwide. The aim of this systematic review was to characterize injuries and mortality after CPMSs focusing on in-hospital management of hemorrhage and vascular injuries. Method A systematic review of all published literature was undertaken in Medline, Embase and Web of Science January 1st, 1968, to February 22nd, 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature was eligible for inclusion if the CPMS included three or more people shot, injured or killed, had vascular injuries or hemorrhage. Results The search identified 2884 studies; 34 were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. There were 2039 wounded in 45 CPMS events. The dominating anatomic injury location per event was the extremity followed by abdomen and chest. The median number of operations and operated patients per event was 22 (5–101) and 10.5 (4–138), respectively. A total of 899 deaths were reported with a median mortality rate of 36.1% per event (15.9–71.4%) Thirty-eight percent (13/34) of all studies reported on vascular injuries. Vascular injuries ranged from 8 to 29%; extremity vascular injury the most frequent. Specific vascular injuries included thoracic aorta 18% (42/232), carotid arteries 6% (14/232), and abdominal aorta 5% (12/232). Vascular injuries were involved in 8.3%-10% of all deaths. Conclusion This systematic review showed an overall high mortality after CPMS with injuries mainly located to the extremities, thorax and abdomen. About one quarter of deaths was related to hemorrhage involving central large vessel injuries. Further understanding of these injuries, and structured and uniform reporting of injuries and treatment protocols may help improve evaluation and management in the future. Level of Evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis, level III.

Keywords