Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology (Feb 2017)

Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer

  • Sweet Ping Ng,
  • Jennifer Tan,
  • Glen Osbourne,
  • Luke Williams,
  • Mathias A.B. Bressel,
  • Rodney J. Hicks,
  • Eddie W.F. Lau,
  • Julie Chu,
  • Samuel Y.K. Ngan,
  • Trevor Leong

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2017.01.008
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. C
pp. 76 – 82

Abstract

Read online

Background: This prospective study aims to determine the impact of PET/CT on radiotherapy planning and outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer. Methods: All patients underwent PET/CT scanning in the radiotherapy treatment position, and received treatment planned using the PET/CT dataset. GTV was defined separately on PET/CT (GTV-PET) and CT (GTV-CT) datasets. A corresponding PTV was generated for each patient. Volumetric and spatial analysis quantified the proportion of FDG-avid disease not included in CT-based volumes. Clinical data was collected to determine locoregional control and overall survival rates. Results: 13 (24.1%) of 57 accrued patients had metastatic disease detected on PET. Median follow up was 4 years. FDG-avid disease would have been excluded from GTV-CT in 29 of 38 patients (76%). In 5 patients, FDG-avid disease would have been completely excluded from the PTV-CT. GTV-CT underestimated the cranial and caudal extent of FDG-avid tumour in 14 (36%) and 10 (26%) patients. 4-Year overall survival and locoregional failure free survival were 37% and 65%. Conclusions: PET/CT altered the delineation of tumour volumes when compared to CT alone, and should be considered standard for treatment planning. Although clinical outcomes were not improved with PET/CT planning, it did allow the use of smaller radiotherapy volumes.

Keywords