BMJ Global Health (Oct 2024)

Cost and cost-effectiveness of digital technologies for support of tuberculosis treatment adherence: a systematic review

  • Ramnath Subbaraman,
  • Katherine L Fielding,
  • Genevieve Gore,
  • Nicola Foster,
  • Kevin Schwartzman,
  • Miranda Zary,
  • Mona Salaheldin Mohamed,
  • Cedric Kafie,
  • Chimweta Ian Chilala,
  • Shruti Bahukudumbi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015654
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 10

Abstract

Read online

Background Digital adherence technologies (DATs) may provide a patient-centred approach to supporting tuberculosis (TB) medication adherence and improving treatment outcomes. We synthesised evidence addressing costs and cost-effectiveness of DATs to support TB treatment.Methods A systematic review (PROSPERO-CRD42022313531) identified relevant literature from January 2000 to April 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science along with preprints from medRxiv, Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies with observational, experimental or quasi-experimental designs (minimum 20 participants) and modelling studies reporting quantitative data on the cost or cost-effectiveness of DATs for TB infection or disease treatment were included. Study characteristics, cost and cost-effectiveness outcomes were extracted.Results Of 3619 titles identified by our systematic search, 29 studies met inclusion criteria, of which 9 addressed cost-effectiveness. DATs included short message service (SMS) reminders, phone-based technologies, digital pillboxes, ingestible sensors and video-observed therapy (VOT). VOT was the most extensively studied (16 studies) and was generally cost saving when compared with healthcare provider directly observed therapy (DOT), particularly when costs to patients were included—though findings were largely from high-income countries. Cost-effectiveness findings were highly variable, ranging from no clinical effect in one study (SMS), to greater effectiveness with concurrent cost savings (VOT) in others. Only eight studies adequately reported at least 80% of the elements required by Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards, a standard reporting checklist for health economic evaluations.Conclusion DATs may be cost saving or cost-effective compared with healthcare provider DOT, particularly in high-income settings. However, more data of higher quality are needed, notably in lower-income and middle-income countries which have the greatest TB burden.