International Journal of Women's Health (Nov 2022)
Leiomyoma with Bizarre Nuclei: A Current Update
Abstract
Enhui Guo,1,2,* Chengqian Li,2,3,* Yanjiao Hu,4 Kongyuan Zhao,1,2 Qingmei Zheng,1,* Liming Wang1,* 1Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China; 2Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Qingmei Zheng; Liming Wang, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 1677, Wutaishan Road, Huangdao District, Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18661806725 ; +86-18661807912, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: Leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei (LBN), also known as symplastic leiomyoma, is a histological subtype of benign leiomyoma with bizarre cells and nuclear atypia. Differentiating LBN from other benign leiomyoma subtypes, uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP), or leiomyosarcoma (LMS) can be diagnostically challenging owing to overlapping features in clinical presentation and pathologic morphological analysis. The difficulty of distinguishing LBN from other lesions, especially from LMS, and the potential of LBN for subsequent malignant transformation make LBN an important topic of research. Herein, we review the definition, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of LBN. Histopathological examination is essential for distinguishing LBN from other diseases. Pathology sampling and morphological examination remain the key to diagnosis. The newly established ancillary immunohistochemical (IHC) and molecular genetic analysis can be useful tools for differential diagnosis. Furthermore, serum biomarkers and imaging examination may also be useful diagnostic tools. Attention should be paid to the differentiation between LBN and LMS because morphological diagnosis may still be challenging in some cases. Some IHC markers of LBN have been identified, which may be helpful for differential diagnosis. Furthermore, the use of IHC panels as diagnostic markers may be advocated. Molecular genetic studies suggest that some genes can aid with the differential diagnosis between LBN and LMS. However, increasing evidence support the idea that LBN and LMS are molecularly related, indicating that LBN may represent a potentially malignant stage of precancerous progression. At present, conservative treatment is recommended for primary LBN, especially for patients desiring to retain fertility, but close follow-up with imaging examinations is required.Keywords: diagnosis, histopathology, molecular genetics, imaging examination, treatment, prognosis