Scientific Reports (Jan 2024)

Risk factors of unintentional piecemeal resection in endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps ≥ 10 mm

  • Tsubasa Ishikawa,
  • Kenichiro Okimoto,
  • Tomoaki Matsumura,
  • Sadahisa Ogasawara,
  • Yoshihiro Fukuda,
  • Yoshio Kitsukawa,
  • Yuya Yokoyama,
  • Kengo Kanayama,
  • Naoki Akizue,
  • Yotaro Iino,
  • Yuki Ohta,
  • Hideaki Ishigami,
  • Takashi Taida,
  • Shin Tsuchiya,
  • Keiko Saito,
  • Hidehiro Kamezaki,
  • Akitoshi Kobayashi,
  • Yasuharu Kikuchi,
  • Minoru Tada,
  • Yuki Shiko,
  • Yoshihito Ozawa,
  • Jun Kato,
  • Taketo Yamaguchi,
  • Naoya Kato

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50815-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract This study aimed to investigate the lesion and endoscopist factors associated with unintentional endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (uniEPMR) of colorectal lesions ≥ 10 mm. uniEPMR was defined from the medical record as anything other than a preoperatively planned EPMR. Factors leading to uniEPMR were identified by retrospective univariate and multivariate analyses of lesions ≥ 10 mm (adenoma including sessile serrated lesion and carcinoma) that were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) at three hospitals. Additionally, a questionnaire survey was conducted to determine the number of cases treated by each endoscopist. A learning curve (LC) was created for each lesion size based on the number of experienced cases and the percentage of uniEPMR. Of 2557 lesions, 327 lesions underwent uniEPMR. The recurrence rate of uniEPMR was 2.8%. Multivariate analysis showed that lesion diameter ≥ 30 mm (odds ratio 11.83, 95% confidence interval 6.80–20.60, p < 0.0001) was the most associated risk factor leading to uniEPMR. In the LC analysis, the proportion of uniEPMR decreased for lesion sizes of 10–19 mm until 160 cases. The proportion of uniEPMR decreased with the number of experienced cases in the 20–29 mm range, while there was no correlation between the number of experienced cases and the proportion of uniEPMR ≥ 30 mm. These results suggest that 160 cases seem to be the minimum number of cases needed to be proficient in en bloc EMR. Additionally, while lesion sizes of 10–29 mm are considered suitable for EMR, lesion sizes ≥ 30 mm are not applicable for en bloc EMR from the perspective of both lesion and endoscopist factors.