Addiction Science & Clinical Practice (Mar 2022)

Automated Reinforcement Management System (ARMS): focused phase I provider feedback

  • Crystal L. Smith,
  • Nicole M. Rodin,
  • Julie Y. Hwang,
  • André Q. C. Miguel,
  • Kim Johnson,
  • Michael G. McDonell,
  • Sterling M. McPherson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-022-00301-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Alcohol use increases risk for morbidity and mortality and is associated with over 3 million annual deaths worldwide. Contingency Management (CM) is one of the most effective interventions for substance use disorders, and has recently been coupled with technologies to promote novel treatments for alcohol use disorders (AUD). Leveraging these technological advances, we are developing the Automated Reinforcement Management System (ARMS), an integrated CM system designed to enable CM treatment as a component of a digital therapeutic or adjunct therapy remotely to anyone with a smartphone. Objective To collect detailed provider feedback on ARMS and determine the need for modifications to make the system most feasible, acceptable, and useful to providers. Methods Seven providers completed one-hour structured interviews/focus groups wherein we described the ARMS system and its application to clinical care. Providers viewed screen shots of the ARMS provider facing and patient facing systems. Providers gave feedback on their current AUD treatment practices, preferences for the functionality and appearance of the system, preferences for receipt of information on their patients, why they and their patients would or would not use the system, suggestions for improvement, and the proposed intervention overall. To analyze the qualitative data gathered, we used a qualitative descriptive approach with content analysis methods. Results The overarching theme of Individualized Treatment emerged throughout the interviews. This sentiment supports use of ARMS, as it is intended to supplement provider communication and intervention as an adjunctive and customizable tool with the ability to reach rural patients, not a stand-alone option. Themes of Accountability and Objective Assessment arose during discussions of why people would use the system. Themes within provider obstacles included, Information Overload and Clinical Relevance, and in patient obstacles, Sustained Engagement and Security Concerns. Two themes emerged regarding suggestions for improvement: Increasing Accessibility and Bi-directional Communication. Discussion Themes from provider input are being used to modify ARMS to make it more user friendly, time saving, and relevant to treatment of AUD. If successful, ARMS will provide effective, individualized-digital therapeutic for those needing adjunctive treatment or those living in rural remote areas needing better connected care.

Keywords