Epidemiology and Health (Aug 2021)

Hydrogen peroxide as an auxiliary treatment for COVID-19 in Brazil: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

  • Marielle Bazzo Di Domênico,
  • Kauê Collares,
  • Renan Brandenburg dos Santos,
  • Ulysses Lenz,
  • Vinícius Picoli Antunes,
  • Vinicius Webber Godinho,
  • Henrique Cesca,
  • Thales Henrique Jincziwski Ponciano,
  • Pedro Henrique Corazza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2021051
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 43

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as mouthwash and nasal spray on symptom relief in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. METHODS Patients positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), who were treated in a hospital or at home, and patients’ family members (not positive for SARS-CoV-2), were randomized into 2 groups: experimental (1% H2O2 for gargling, 0.5% H2O2 for nasal wash), and control. Patients gargled the solution 3 times a day, and applied the nasal spray twice a day, for a 7-day period. Family members received the same treatment as the treated COVID-19 patient. The researchers contacted patients every 2 days over an 8-day period. An average post-treatment interval of 8 days passed before testing family members. RESULTS The most frequent symptoms on day 0 were cough, loss of taste, and hyposmia; there were no significant differences between groups, independent of the period. The symptom of dyspnea presented a significant difference between days 2 and 4 (p<0.05). Among family members, 86.0% had no antibodies, 2.3% had antibodies, and 11.6% had active infections (4 in the experimental group and 6 in the control group). The most frequent adverse effects in the H2O2 group were a burning throat and nose. CONCLUSIONS H2O2 was not effective for the relief of COVID-19 symptoms and was associated with reports of transient adverse effects.

Keywords