Frontiers in Immunology (Mar 2024)

Type I interferon pathway activation across the antiphospholipid syndrome spectrum: associations with disease subsets and systemic antiphospholipid syndrome presentation

  • Irene Cecchi,
  • Irene Cecchi,
  • Massimo Radin,
  • Massimo Radin,
  • Alice Barinotti,
  • Alice Barinotti,
  • Silvia Grazietta Foddai,
  • Silvia Grazietta Foddai,
  • Elisa Menegatti,
  • Dario Roccatello,
  • Dario Roccatello,
  • Ana Suárez,
  • Ana Suárez,
  • Savino Sciascia,
  • Savino Sciascia,
  • Javier Rodríguez-Carrio,
  • Javier Rodríguez-Carrio

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1351446
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionWhile the type I interferon (IFN-I) pathway is crucial in autoimmunity, its role in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive subjects, including aPL carriers and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients, is poorly understood. This study aims at characterizing IFN-I pathway activation within the spectrum of aPL-positive subsets.MethodsA total of 112 patients [29 aPL carriers, 31 primary APS (PAPS), 25 secondary APS (SAPS), 27 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients without aPL, and 44 healthy controls (HCs)] were recruited. IFI6, IFI44, IFI44L, MX1, IFI27, OAS1, and RSAD2 gene expression was evaluated in whole blood, and a composite index (IFN score) was calculated.ResultsAn overall activation of the IFN-I pathway was observed across the entire APS spectrum, with differences among genes based on the specific disease subset. The composite score revealed quantitative differences across subsets, being elevated in aPL carriers and PAPS patients compared to HCs (both p < 0.050) and increasing in SAPS (p < 0.010) and SLE patients (p < 0.001). An unsupervised cluster analysis identified three clusters, and correspondence analyses revealed differences in clusters usage across APS subsets (p < 0.001). A network analysis revealed different patterns characterizing different subsets. The associations between IFN-I pathway activation and clinical outcomes differed across APS subsets. Although no differences in gene expression were observed in systemic APS, the network analyses revealed specific gene–gene patterns, and a distinct distribution of the clusters previously identified was noted (p = 0.002).ConclusionIFN-I pathway activation is a common hallmark among aPL-positive individuals. Qualitative and quantitative differences across the APS spectrum can be identified, leading to the identification of distinct IFN-I signatures with different clinical values beyond traditional categorization.

Keywords