Monitoring recurrent angioedema: Findings from the Turkish angioedema control test validation study

Abstract

Abstract Background Determination of control level in recurrent angioedema (RAE) is necessary to guide management. Here, we validated a Turkish version of the angioedema control test (AECT) for 4‐week (AECT‐4wk) and for 3‐month (AECT‐3mth) and assessed their utility in monitoring RAE. Method The recommended structured translation process for patient‐reported outcome measures was completed. The final versions were administered to 51 patients with mast cell‐mediated angioedema (MMAE) and 38 patients with hereditary angioedema, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was determined. Additionally, anchor surveys comprising angioedema activity score for 28 days (AAS‐28 day), visual analog score for angioedema control, Likert scale for the control level from the patient's perspective (LS‐AEC), angioedema quality of life, short form‐12 (SF‐12) and patients' assessment of treatment sufficiency were applied. Results The Turkish AECT versions showed good convergent validity with a substantial correlation with anchor tools and known‐group validity. Excellent internal consistency and reproducibility were observed. Equal or more than 10 of 16 points scored with the AECT‐4wk and AECT‐3mth identified patients with well‐controlled disease. The disease activity, control and burden parameters were consistent with the disease control level defined depending on the cut‐off point 10 of AECT. Three‐point changes in AECT‐4wk and ‐3 mt could detect MCID in disease control in all patients. Conclusions Turkish AECT versions are valid and reliable tools for assessing and monitoring disease control in patients with RAE. The use of the Turkish versions of the AECT in routine patient care, clinical trials and angioedema research is recommended.

Keywords

• angioedema
• angioedema control test
• control
• disease activity
• hereditary angioedema
• impact