BJGP Open (Dec 2023)

Proactive familial cancer risk assessment: a service development study in UK primary care

  • Abdul Rahman Badran,
  • Alice Youngs,
  • Andrea Forman,
  • Marisa Elms,
  • Lai-Lai Chang,
  • Fiyaz Lebbe,
  • Adam Reekie,
  • John Short,
  • Min Theik Hlaing,
  • Emma Watts,
  • Deborah Hipps,
  • Katie Snape

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0076
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Background: Family history assessment can identify individuals above population-risk for cancer to enable targeted Screening, Prevention, and Early Detection (SPED). Family History Questionnaire Service (FHQS) is a resource-efficient patient-facing online tool to facilitate this. In the UK, cancer risk assessment is usually only offered to concerned individuals proactively self-presenting to their GP, leading to inequity in accessing SPED in the community. Aim: To improve access to community cancer genetic risk assessment and explore barriers to uptake. Design & setting: Service development project of a digital pathway using the FHQS for cancer risk assessment across four general practices within the clinical remit of the South West Thames Centre for Genomics (SWTCG). Method: 3100 individuals aged 38–50 years were invited to complete the FHQS through either text message or email. A random selection of 100 non-responders were contacted to determine barriers to uptake. Results: In total, n = 304/3100 (10%) registered for the FHQS. Responders were more likely to be British (63% vs 47%, P<0.001), speak English as their main language (92% vs 76%, P<0.001), and not require an interpreter (99.6% vs 94.9%, P = 0.001). Of 304 responders, 158 (52%) were automatically identified as at population-risk without full family history review. Of the remaining 146 responders, 52 (36%) required either additional screening referral (n = 23), genetics referral (n = 15), and/or advice to relatives (n = 18). Of 100 non-responders contacted, eight had incorrect contact details and 53 were contactable. Reasons for not responding included not receiving invitation details (n = 26), losing the invitation (n = 5), or forgetting (n = 4). Conclusion: The FHQS can be used as part of a low-resource primary care pathway to identify individuals in the community above population-risk for cancer requiring action. This study highlighted barriers to uptake requiring consideration to maximise impact and minimise inequity.

Keywords