Scientific Reports (Apr 2022)

Chromatic discrimination in fixed saturation levels from trichromats and subjects with congenital color vision deficiency

  • Yuzo Igarashi,
  • Luiza Karina Gonçalves Meireles,
  • Felipe André Costa Brito,
  • Leonardo Ramos Nicolau da Costa,
  • Joyce dos Santos Freitas,
  • Leticia Miquilini,
  • Luiz Claudio Portnoi Baran,
  • Leonardo Dutra Henriques,
  • Einat Hauzman,
  • Daniela Maria Oliveira Bonci,
  • Marcelo Fernandes Costa,
  • Dora Fix Ventura,
  • Paulo Roney Kilpp Goulart,
  • Givago Silva Souza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09531-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Color vision tests use estimative of threshold color discrimination or number of correct responses to evaluate performance in chromatic discrimination tasks. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages. In the present investigation, we compared the number of errors during color discrimination task in normal trichromats and participants with color vision deficiency (CVD) using pseudoisochromatic stimuli at fixed saturation levels. We recruited 28 normal trichromats and eight participants with CVD. Cambridge Color Test was used to categorize their color vision phenotype, and those with a phenotype suggestive of color vision deficiency had their L- and M-opsin genes genotyped. Pseudoisochromatic stimuli were shown with target chromaticity in 20 vectors radiating from the background chromaticity and saturation of 0.06, 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, and 0.005 u’v' units. Each stimulus condition appeared in four trials. The number of errors for each stimulus condition was considered an indicator of the participant's performance. At high chromatic saturation, there were fewer errors from both phenotypes. The errors of the normal trichromats had no systematic variation for high saturated stimuli, but below 0.02 u’v' units, there was a discrete prevalence of tritan errors. For participants with CVD, the errors happened mainly in red-green chromatic vectors. A three-way ANOVA showed that all factors (color vision phenotype, stimulus saturation, and chromatic vector) had statistically significant effects on the number of errors and that stimulus saturation was the most important main effect. ROC analysis indicated that the performance of the fixed saturation levels to identify CVD was better between 0.02 and 0.06 u’v’ units reaching 100%, while saturation of 0.01 and 0.005 u’v’ units decreased the accuracy of the screening of the test. We concluded that the color discrimination task using high saturated stimuli separated normal trichromats and participants with red-green color vision deficiencies with high performance, which can be considered a promising method for new color vision tests based in frequency of errors.