American Journal of Islam and Society (Jul 2004)

Islamic Fundamentalism and the Doctrine of Jihad

  • Mikhail Ali

DOI
https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v21i3.1783
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

A. J. Abraham, a professor at CUNY and the New York Institute of Technology, as well as a scholar of Near and Middle Eastern History, accurately states that the “Islamic Tendency” has been a significant phenomenon in contemporary times and has “attracted a great deal of negative attention” (p. 2). This compendium packages two prior works: The Warriors of God: Jihad (Holy War) and the Fundamentalists of Islam and a monograph entitled Khoumani and Islamic Fundamentalism: Contributions of Islamic Sciences to Modern Civilization. The former is based largely on thesis material coauthored with George I. Haddad at Princeton; the latter is a monograph presented during the 1979 hostage crisis in Iran. The intent of bringing these two works together is ambitious: to foster a “sympathetic” but objective lay understanding of jihad (p. 2) that excludes the sensationalist views exploited by all factions for political aspirations. The author’s premise, as noted in the preface, is the need for “balanced yet opposing points of view” (p. 3). The first work provides a background and insight on jihad that delves beyond the “holy war versus internal struggle” discussion. A methodological breakdown of jihad into seven chapter topics, starting with the hermeneutical “Doctrine of Jihad” and ending with the legalistic “Status of Non-Moslems,” follows a logical pedagogy in the conventional understanding of jihad from an ideological framework to an actual interpreted law. Abraham also acknowledges factors leading to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism (p. 12), and thereby provides a succinct framework for further discussion. Inasmuch as these factors could have been more seamlessly tied to current developments across the Middle East, Abraham treats the defunct clash between the Islamic world and the Soviet empire as more a symptom of “resisting secularism” than of addressing the actual appeal of Islamic fundamentalism itself to individuals and the collective Muslim psyche ...