Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (Apr 2007)

Comportamento de amostras ambientais e clínicas de Cryptococcus neoformans frente a fungicidas de uso agronômico e ao fluconazol Behaviour azole fungicide and fluconazole in Cryptococcus neoformans clinical and environmental isolates

  • Elislene Dias Drummond,
  • Juliana Quero Reimão,
  • Amanda Latercia Tranches Dias,
  • Antônio Martins de Siqueira

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822007000200012
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 40, no. 2
pp. 209 – 211

Abstract

Read online

Avaliou-se a atividade de fungicidas azólicos de uso agronômico (epoxiconazol, difenoconazol e ciproconazol) em comparação ao antifúngico de uso terapêutico fluconazol sobre 23 amostras ambientais de Cryptococcus neoformans var neoformans isoladas de fezes de pombos, as quais foram coletadas em fazendas com práticas agrícolas empregando compostos azólicos e 11 amostras clínicas isoladas de pacientes portadores de criptococose. Os testes de sensibilidade foram realizados pela técnica de diluição em agar. A concentração inibitória mínima capaz de inibir 50% dos isolados ambientais (CIM 50) foi de 6,0µg/mL para epoxiconazol, 1,0µg/mL para difenoconazol, 2,0µg/mL para ciproconazol e 64,0µg/mL para fluconazol. Entre os isolados clínicos os valores de CIM 50 foram 2,0µg/mL, 0,38µg/mL, 1,0µg/mL e 16,0µg/mL para epoxiconazol, difenoconazol, ciproconazol e fluconazol, respectivamente. Os valores de CIM 50 em relação aos isolados de origem ambiental foram maiores do que os valores para os isolados de origem clínica. Em nosso estudo, frente ao mesmo antifúngico, as amostras ambientais apresentaram comportamento significativamente diferente em relação às amostras clínicas (p The activity of azole fungicides for agronomical use (epoxiconazole, difenoconazole and cyproconazole) was evaluated in comparison with the therapeutic antifungal agent fluconazole, on 23 environmental samples of Cryptococcus neoformans var neoformans isolated from pigeon feces that were collected from farms with agricultural practices using azole compounds, and on 11 clinical samples isolated from patients with cryptococcosis. Sensitivity tests were performed using the agar dilution technique. The minimum inhibitory concentration capable of inhibiting 50% of the environmental isolates (MIC 50) was 6.00µg/ml to epoxiconazole, 1.00µg/ml for difenoconazole, 2.00µg/ml for cyproconazole and 64.00µg/ml for fluconazole. Among the clinical isolates the MIC 50 values were 2.00µg/ml, 0.38µg/ml, 1.00µg/ml and 16.00µg/ml for epoxiconazole, difenoconazole, cyproconazole and fluconazole, respectively. The MIC 50 values for environmental isolates were greater than the MIC 50 values for clinical isolates. In our study, in relation to the same antifungal agent, the environmental samples presented significantly different behaviour in relation to the clinical samples (p<0.05). Differences in the MIC values (p<0.05) presented by fluconazole and the other antifungal agents for agronomical use, both in the environmental isolates and in the clinical isolates, were also observed.

Keywords