Scientific Reports (Mar 2024)

Repositioned versus exchanged flanged intraocular lens fixation for intraocular lens dislocation

  • Yong Koo Kang,
  • Dong Ho Park,
  • Gahyung Ryu,
  • Hong Kyun Kim,
  • Dong Hyun Kim,
  • Jae Rock Do

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54694-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract This study aimed to compare the outcomes of flanged intraocular lens (IOL) fixation with new IOL exchange after dislocated IOL removal and repositioned dislocated IOL in patients with IOL dislocation. Eighty-nine eyes that underwent flanged IOL fixation were retrospectively included, with 51 eyes in the exchanged IOL group and 38 eyes in the repositioned IOL group. In both groups, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and did not differ between the two groups at any of these time points. However, at 1 week postoperatively, BCVA in the repositioned IOL group improved compared with baseline, whereas that in the exchanged IOL group did not. Moreover, there were lesser changes in the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) and corneal astigmatism in the repositioned IOL group than in the exchanged IOL group. The IOL positions, including IOL tilt and IOL decentration, were not different between the groups. Flanged IOL fixation with new IOL exchange and with repositioned dislocated IOL for patients with IOL dislocation had similar visual outcomes and IOL position. However, the latter had a smaller corneal ECD decrease and astigmatic change. This technique was effective in treating IOL dislocation while minimizing corneal injury.