Brain and Spine (Jan 2023)

Correlation between MRI-based spinal muscle parameters and the vertebral bone quality score in lumbar fusion patients

  • Manuel Moser,
  • Leonardo Albertini Sanchez,
  • Dominik Adl Amini,
  • Lisa Oezel,
  • Stephan N. Salzmann,
  • Maximilian Muellner,
  • Henryk Haffer,
  • Ek T. Tan,
  • Jennifer Shue,
  • Andrew A. Sama,
  • Frank P. Cammisa,
  • Federico P. Girardi,
  • Alexander P. Hughes

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3
p. 102684

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: The vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score that is based on non-contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI was recently introduced as a novel measure of bone quality in the lumbar spine and shown to be a significant predictor of healthy versus osteopenic/osteoporotic bone. Research question: This study aimed to assess possible correlations between the VBQ score and the functional cross-sectional area (FCSA) of psoas and lumbar spine extensor muscles. Material and methods: Patients who underwent fusion surgery between 2014 and 2017 and had lumbar MRI and CT scans within 6 months prior to surgery were included. The FCSA was assessed at L3-L5 using a pixel intensity threshold method. The VBQ score was calculated by dividing the signal intensity (SI) of the vertebrae L1-L4 through the SI of the cerebrospinal fluid at L3. Volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) was assessed by quantitative CT. Results: 80 patients (58.8% female, median age 68.8 years) were included. Overall prevalence of osteopenia/osteoporosis was 66.3%, with no significant differences between men and women. The mean (SD) VBQ score was significantly smaller in men, at 2.26 (0.45) versus women at 2.59 (0.39) (p = 0.001). After adjusting for age and BMI, a significant negative correlation was seen between the VBQ score and psoas FCSA at L3 (β = −0.373; p = 0.022), but only in men. Conclusion: Our results highlight sex differences in the VBQ score that were not demonstrated by vBMD and suggest a potential role of this novel measure to assess not only bone quality, but also spinal muscle quantity.

Keywords