Materials (Dec 2022)

Ce<sup>3+</sup>, Pr<sup>3+</sup> Co-Doped Lu<sub>3</sub>Al<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> Single Crystals and Ceramics: A Comparative Study

  • Yifei Xiong,
  • Yun Shi,
  • Haibo Wang,
  • Qian Zhang,
  • Tong Wu,
  • Qiang Yuan,
  • Kaicheng Ma,
  • Tongtong Li,
  • Zhenzhen Zhou,
  • Jinghong Fang,
  • Huan He,
  • Jinqi Ni,
  • Qian Liu,
  • Jiangding Yu,
  • Sheng Cui,
  • Oleg Shichalin,
  • Eugeniy Papynov

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15249025
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 24
p. 9025

Abstract

Read online

Ce3+, Pr3+ co-doped Lu3Al5O12 (Ce, Pr:LuAG) single crystals and ceramics were prepared using the optical floating zone (OFZ) and reactive vacuum sintering methods, respectively. The microstructure, photo- (λex = 450 nm), and radio-luminescence (under X-ray excitation) performance, as well as scintillation light yield (LY, under γ-ray, 137Cs source) of both materials, were investigated and compared. Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics had an in-line transmittance of approximately 20% in the visible light range, while the analogous crystals were more transparent (~65%). The X-ray excited luminescent (XEL) spectra showed the characteristic Ce 3+ and Pr3+ emissions located at 310 nm, 380 nm, and 510 nm. The highest LY of the Ce, Pr:LuAG ceramics reached 34,112 pho/MeV at 2 μs time gate, which is higher than that of a single crystal. The ratio of LY values (LY2/LY0.75) between shaping times of 0.75 μs and 2 μs indicated a faster scintillation decay of ceramics regarding single crystals. It was ascribed to the lower effective concentration of luminescent activators in single crystals because of the coefficient segregation effect.

Keywords