PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases (Sep 2019)

Real-time PCR for diagnosis of imported schistosomiasis.

  • Hélène Guegan,
  • Judith Fillaux,
  • Eléna Charpentier,
  • Florence Robert-Gangneux,
  • Pamela Chauvin,
  • Emilie Guemas,
  • Jérôme Boissier,
  • Alexis Valentin,
  • Sophie Cassaing,
  • Jean-Pierre Gangneux,
  • Antoine Berry,
  • Xavier Iriart

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007711
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 9
p. e0007711

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe diagnosis of schistosomiasis currently relies on microscopic detection of schistosome eggs in stool or urine samples and serological assays. The poor sensitivity of standard microscopic procedures performed in routine laboratories, makes molecular detection methods of increasing interest. The aim of the study was to evaluate two in-house real-time Schistosoma PCRs, targeting respectively S. mansoni [Sm] and S. haematobium [Sh] in excreta, biopsies and sera as potential tools to diagnose active infections and to monitor treatment efficacy.MethodsSchistosoma PCRs were performed on 412 samples (124 urine, 86 stools, 8 biopsies, 194 sera) from patients with suspected schistosomiasis, before anti-parasitic treatment. Results were compared to microscopic examination and serological assays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect haemagglutination (HA) and Western Blot (WB) assay).ResultsCompared to microscopy, PCRs significantly increased the sensitivity of diagnosis, from 4% to 10.5% and from 33.7% to 48.8%, for Sh in urine and Sm in stools, respectively. The overall sensitivity of PCR on serum samples was 72.7% and reached 94.1% in patients with positive excreta (microscopy). The specificity of serum PCR was 98.9%. After treatment, serum PCR positivity rates slowly declined from 93.8% at day 30 to 8.3% at day 360, whereas antibody detection remained positive after 1 year.ConclusionSchistosoma PCRs clearly outperform standard microscopy on stools and urine and could be part of reference methods combined with WB-based serology, which remains a gold standard for initial diagnosis. When serological assays are positive and microscopy is negative, serum PCRs provide species information to guide further clinical exploration. Biomarkers such as DNA and antibodies are of limited relevance for early treatment monitoring but serum PCR could be useful when performed at least 1 year after treatment to help confirm a cured infection.