Frontiers in Chemistry (Oct 2021)
Fusing NIR and Process Sensors Data for Polymer Production Monitoring
Abstract
Process analytical technology and multivariate process monitoring are nowadays the most effective approaches to achieve real-time quality monitoring/control in production. However, their use is not yet a common practice, and industries benefit much less than they could from the outcome of the hundreds of sensors that constantly monitor production in industrial plants. The huge amount of sensor data collected are still mostly used to produce univariate control charts, monitoring one compartment at a time, and the product quality variables are generally used to monitor production, despite their low frequency (offline measurements at analytical laboratory), which is not suitable for real-time monitoring. On the contrary, it would be extremely advantageous to benefit from predictive models that, based on online sensors, will be able to return quality parameters in real time. As a matter of fact, the plant setup influences the product quality, and process sensors (flow meters, thermocouples, etc.) implicitly register process variability, correlation trends, drift, etc. When the available spectroscopic sensors, reflecting chemical composition and structure, consent to monitor the intermediate products, coupling process, and spectroscopic sensor and extracting/fusing information by multivariate analysis from this data would enhance the evaluation of the produced material features allowing production quality to be estimated at a very early stage. The present work, at a pilot plant scale, applied multivariate statistical process control (MSPC) charts, obtained by data fusion of process sensor data and near-infrared (NIR) probes, on a continuous styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) production process. Furthermore, PLS regression was used for real-time prediction of the Melt Flow Index and percentage of bounded acrylonitrile (%AN). The results show that the MSPC model was able to detect deviations from normal operative conditions, indicating the variables responsible for the deviation, be they spectral or process. Moreover, predictive regression models obtained using the fused data showed better results than models computed using single datasets in terms of both errors of prediction and R2. Thus, the fusion of spectra and process data improved the real-time monitoring, allowing an easier visualization of the process ongoing, a faster understanding of possible faults, and real-time assessment of the final product quality.
Keywords
