Repositioning multiculturalism in Ethiopia: a case study of Netsa Hasab (Free Thought) political talk show on Walta TV

Abstract

This article examines how Ethiopian political parties promoting citizenship-based federalism position multiculturalism in their discourse, as reflected in their participation in talk shows aired on Walta TV. Building on Habermas’s theory of public sphere, it analyzed political talk shows discussing federalism among purposively selected political party leaders through the lens of Discourse Historical Approach. The analysis has indicated that the discursive practices in the talk shows were intended to center around central themes that include ensuring fair and free elections, promoting unity, creating inclusive policies, and decentralizing power. However, the party leaders employed discursive strategies of nominations, predications, and rhetorical questions to portray their nemeses as troublemakers. Alternatively, they employed a strategy of positive self-portrayal, positioning themselves as the saviors of Ethiopia from potential disintegration. This approach entailed effectively addressing any criticisms directed towards them to uphold a positive perception. As a result, the shows focused more on the personalities and political behaviors of party leaders. Therefore, the talk shows exhibit a notable dearth of substantive elements pertaining to multicultural values, with the discourses demonstrating limited engagement with the subject of multiculturalism. In so doing, the discussions raised concerns that giving priority to identity-based diversity politics might have adverse effects on the cohesion of the nation.

Keywords

• Multiculturalism
• citizenship-based federalism
• political parties
• political talk shows
• public sphere
• discourse historical approach