Pharmacological Research (Oct 2023)

Anti-VEGF combined with ocular corticosteroids therapy versus anti-VEGF monotherapy for diabetic macular edema focusing on drugs injection times and confounding factors of pseudophakic eyes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Chengming Chen,
  • Zhaoyang Wang,
  • Weiming Yan,
  • Yanyan Lan,
  • Xiaolong Yan,
  • Tian Li,
  • Jing Han

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 196
p. 106904

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness and safety of combining intravitreal endothelial growth factor inhibitor (anti-VEGF) and ocular corticosteroids for diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Articles concentrating on the efficacy and safety of combining anti-VEGF and ocular corticosteroids therapy for DME versus anti-VEGF monotherapy was screened systematically. Meta-analysis was conducted on the basis of a protocol registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023408338) and performed on the extracted continuous variables and dichotomous variables. The outcome was expressed as weighted mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR). Results: Add up to 21 studies including 1468 eyes were enrolled in this study. The MD for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement at 1/3/6/12-month between the combination therapy group and monotherapy group were 2.56 (95% CI [0.43, 4.70]), 2.46 (95% CI [−0.40, 5.32]), − 1.76 (95% CI [−3.18, −0.34]), − 1.94 (95% CI [−3.87, 0.00]), respectively. The MD for central retinal thickness (CMT) reduction at 1/3/6/12-month between two groups were − 66.27 (95% CI [−101.08, −31.47]), − 33.62 (95% CI [−57.55, −9.70]), − 4.54 (95% CI [−16.84, 7.76]), − 26.67 (95% CI [−41.52, −11.82]), respectively. Additionally, the combination group had higher relative risk of high intraocular pressure and cataract progression events. Conclusions: Anti-VEGF combined with ocular corticosteroids had a significant advantage over anti-VEGF monotherapy within 3 months of DME treatment, which reached the maximum with increasing anti-VEGF injection times to 3. However, with the prolongation of the treatment cycle, the effect of combined therapy after 6 months was no better than monotherapy, and the side effects of combined therapy were more severe.

Keywords