Timing of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in relation to surgery is crucial for outcome

Abstract

Adjuvant immunotherapies targeting CTLA4 or PD-1 recently demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of earlier stages of human cancer. We previously demonstrated using mouse spontaneous metastasis models that neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery was superior, compared to surgery and adjuvant immunotherapy, in eradicating the lethal metastatic disease. However, the optimal scheduling between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery and how it impacts on efficacy and development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains undefined. Using orthotopic 4T1.2 and E0771 mouse models of spontaneously metastatic mammary cancer, we varied the schedule and duration of neoadjuvant immunotherapies and surgery and examined how it impacted on long-term survival. In two tumor models, we demonstrated that a short duration (4–5 days) between first administration of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and resection of the primary tumor was necessary for optimal efficacy, while extending this duration (10 days) abrogated immunotherapy efficacy. However, efficacy was also lost if neoadjuvant immunotherapy was given too close to surgery (2 days). Interestingly, an additional 4 adjuvant doses of treatment following a standard 2 doses of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, did not significantly improve overall tumor-free survival regardless of the combination treatment (anti-PD-1+anti-CD137 or anti-CTLA4+anti-PD-1). Furthermore, biochemical immune-related adverse events (irAEs) increased in tumor-bearing mice that received the additional adjuvant immunotherapy. Overall, our data suggest that shorter doses of neoadjuvant immunotherapy scheduled close to the time of surgery may optimize effective anti-tumor immunity and reduce severe irAEs.

Keywords

• neoadjuvant immunotherapy
• surgery
• scheduling
• metastases
• iraes