BMC Psychiatry (Apr 2023)

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of frontline healthcare workers in a highly affected region in Brazil

  • Mírian Cohen,
  • Luciane Nascimento Cruz,
  • Ricardo Bertoglio Cardoso,
  • Maria de Fátima Pessoa Militão de Albuquerque,
  • Ulisses Ramos Montarroyos,
  • Wayner Vieira de Souza,
  • Ana Bernarda Ludermir,
  • Maria Rosimery de Carvalho,
  • Julianne Damiana da Silva Vicente,
  • Marcelo Paulino Viegas Filho,
  • Fanny Julia Mireille Cortes,
  • Marina Teixeira de Siqueira Silva,
  • Carla Menezes Cavalcante Almeida,
  • Luana Nepomuceno Gondim Costa Lima,
  • Maria Amelia de Sousa Mascena Veras,
  • Carl Kendall,
  • Ligia Regina Franco Sansigolo Kerr,
  • Celina Maria Turchi Martelli,
  • Suzi Alves Camey

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04702-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs), especially in low and middle-income countries, which had to face additional political, social, and economic challenges. We thus aimed to assess the prevalence of mental health outcomes and the associated factors in HCWs treating COVID-19 patients in one of the most affected regions in Brazil. Methods We used the Respondent-Driven Sampling method to assess the risks of COVID-19 infection and symptoms of mental disorders in nurses, nursing technicians, and physicians who worked on the frontline in the metropolitan region of Recife. 865 healthcare workers completed a survey regarding sociodemographic data, work-related risks, and symptoms of mental disorders - SRQ-20 for common mental disorders (CMD); AUDIT-C for problematic alcohol use; GAD-7 for anxiety; PHQ-9 for depression; PCL-5 for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Gile’s successive sampling estimator was used to produce the weighted estimates by professional category. A Poisson regression model with robust variance was used to analyze factors associated with a positive screening for CMD. We will present the results of a cross-sectional analysis of the mental health outcomes after the first peak of COVID-19 – from August 2020 to February 2021. Results The prevalence ratios for a positive screening for CMD were 34.9% (95% CI: 27.8–41.9) in nurses, 28.6% (95% CI: 21.3–36.0) in physicians, and 26.6% (95% CI: 16.8–36.5) in nursing technicians. Nurses presented a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms (23%). Positive screening for problematic alcohol use (10.5 to14.0%), anxiety (10.4 to 13.3%), and PTSD (3.3 to 4.4%) were similar between the professional categories. The main factors associated with CMD in nurses and physicians were related to an intrinsic susceptibility to mental illness, such as previous or family history of psychiatric disorder, and female sex. Among nurse technicians, work-related factors, such as accidents with biological material, presented the strongest association with CMD. Conclusion The mental health of HCWs fighting COVID-19 in Recife was severely affected. It is crucial that healthcare services provide adequate working conditions and psychological support, investing in programs to promote and protect HCWs mental health.

Keywords