Accelerated versus Standard Corneal Cross-linking for Progressive Keratoconus in Syria

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To compare the outcomes of accelerated versus standard corneal cross-linking for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, 63 eyes of 40 patients with progressive keratoconus were divided into two groups; 27 eyes in group one were treated with an accelerated protocol (10 mW/cm 2 , 9 min) and 36 eyes in group two were treated with the standard method (3 mW/cm 2 , 30 min). Visual acuity, refraction, corneal topography, corneal tomography, and anterior and posterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were assessed preoperatively and 18–30 months postoperatively. Results: The LogMAR uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity values were improved in both groups postoperatively. However, the improvement was significantly higher in group one (P 0.05). The anterior corneal trefoil was significantly reduced in group one (P = 0.002), whereas anterior total HOAs and coma were significantly improved in group two (P < 0.0014, all). The posterior corneal spherical aberration decreased significantly in group one (P = 0.02), while group two revealed significant reduction in the posterior trefoil values (P = 0.011). The change in the anterior maximum keratometry was significantly and positively correlated to the preoperative maximum keratometry in group two (P = 0.53, P = 0.003). Conclusion: An accelerated cross-linking protocol using 10 mW/cm 2 for 9 min showed more visual improvement and less pachymetric reduction when compared to the standard protocol, however, anterior corneal flattening, posterior corneal steepening, and the change in the posterior astigmatism were significantly higher in the standard protocol; while corneal HOAs were improved in both protocols.

Keywords

• accelerated
• corneal crosslinking
• hoas
• keratometry
• posterior astigmatism
• standard