Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (May 2023)

A novel “7 sutures and 8 knots” surgical technique in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: tuberosity healing improves short-term clinical results

  • Elisa Troiano,
  • Giacomo Peri,
  • Irene Calò,
  • Giovanni Battista Colasanti,
  • Nicola Mondanelli,
  • Stefano Giannotti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00697-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Complex proximal humeral fractures (cPHFs) represent an important public health concern, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has emerged as a feasible treatment option in the elderly with high functional demands. Recent studies have shown that tuberosity healing leads to better clinical outcomes and an improved range of motion. However, the best surgical technique for the management of the tuberosities is still a topic of debate. The purpose of this retrospective observational study is to report the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a consecutive series of patients who underwent RSA for cPHFs using a novel “7 sutures and 8 knots” technique. Materials and methods A consecutive series of 32 patients (33 shoulders) were treated with this technique by a single surgeon from January 2017 to September 2021. Results at a minimum follow-up of 12 months and a mean ± SD follow-up of 35.9 ± 16.2 (range 12–64) months are reported. Results The tuberosity union rate was 87.9% (29 out of 33 shoulders), the mean Constant score was 66.7 ± 20.5 (range 29–100) points, and the mean DASH score was 33.4 ± 22.6 (range 2–85) points. Conclusions The “7 sutures and 8 knots” technique, which relies on three sutures around the implant and five bridging sutures between the tuberosities, is a relatively simple procedure which provides a reliable means for anatomic restoration of the tuberosities and allows functional recovery of the shoulder in elderly patients with cPHFs treated with RSA. Level of evidence: IV; retrospective atudy. Trial registration: At our institution, no institutional review board nor ethical committee approval is necessary for retrospective studies.

Keywords