Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Individuals With Rare Diseases in China: Nation-Wide Online Survey

Abstract

BackgroundRare diseases (RDs) affect millions of people worldwide, and these diseases can severely impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of those affected. Despite this, there is a lack of research measuring HRQoL using the EQ-5D-5L, which is one of the most widely used generic preference-based instruments to measure HRQoL in populations living with RDs. ObjectiveThis study aimed to measure HRQoL using the EQ-5D-5L in a large number of patients with various types of RDs in China, and to examine the relationship between respondents’ socioeconomic characteristics and preference-based health utility scores. MethodsThe data used in this study were obtained from a web-based survey conducted in China. The survey aimed to explore and understand the health and socioeconomic status of patients with RDs in China. We recruited registered and eligible members, including patients or their primary caregivers, from 33 RD patient associations to complete the questionnaires via their internal social networks. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L utility score, which was calculated based on an established Chinese value set. Utility scores have been presented based on demographics and disease-related information. Univariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the differences in the EQ-5D-5L utility scores between subgroups. ResultsA total of 12,502 respondents completed the questionnaire and provided valid responses, including 6919 self-completed respondents and 5583 proxy-completed respondents. Data from 10,102 participants over the age of 12 years were elicited for analysis. Among patients with RDs, 65.3% (6599/10,102), 47.5% (4799/10,102), 47.0% (4746/10,102), 24.8% (2506/10,102), and 18.4% (1855/10,102) reported no problems for “self-care,” “usual activities,” “mobility,” “pain/discomfort,” and “anxiety/depression,” respectively. A full health state was reported by 6.0% (413/6902) and 9.2% (295/3200) of self- and proxy-completed patients, respectively. Among self-completed patients, 69.9% (4826/6902) and 50.4% (3478/6902) reported no problems for “self-care” and “usual activities,” respectively, whereas only 17.7% (1223/6902) reported problems for “anxiety/depression.” Proxy-completed respondents showed a higher proportion of reporting extreme problems than self-completed respondents in all 5 dimensions. The mean utility scores reported by self- and proxy-completed respondents were 0.691 and 0.590, respectively. Different types of caregivers reported different utility scores, and among them, proxy-completed (mother) respondents reported the highest mean utility score. ConclusionsThe establishment of a normative profile for RD patients can facilitate patients’ adaptation and assess the effectiveness of interventions to improve the HRQoL and well-being of this population. Differences between self- and proxy-completed HRQoL assessed by the EQ-5D-5L have been identified in this study. This finding highlights the importance of incorporating perspectives from both patients and their proxies in clinical practice. Further development of the patient cohort is necessary to assess long-term changes in HRQoL in the RD population.