Journal of Clinical Medicine (Oct 2021)

Identifying Patients without a Survival Benefit following Transfemoral and Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

  • Daniela Geisler,
  • Piotr Nikodem Rudziński,
  • Waseem Hasan,
  • Martin Andreas,
  • Ena Hasimbegovic,
  • Christopher Adlbrecht,
  • Bernhard Winkler,
  • Gabriel Weiss,
  • Andreas Strouhal,
  • Georg Delle-Karth,
  • Martin Grabenwöger,
  • Markus Mach

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214911
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 21
p. 4911

Abstract

Read online

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) offers a novel treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, particularly for patients who are unsuitable candidates for surgical intervention. However, high therapeutical costs, socio-economic considerations, and numerous comorbidities make it necessary to target and allocate available resources efficiently. In the present study, we aimed to identify risk factors associated with futile treatment following transfemoral (TF) and transapical (TA) TAVR. Five hundred and thirty-two consecutive patients (82 ± 9 years, female 63%) who underwent TAVR between June 2009 and December 2016 at the Vienna Heart Center Hietzing were retrospectively analyzed to identify predictors of futility, defined as all-cause mortality at one year following the procedure for the overall patient cohort, as well as the TF and TA cohort. Out of 532 patients, 91 (17%) did not survive the first year after TAVR. A multivariate logistic model identified cerebrovascular disease, home oxygen dependency, wheelchair dependency, periinterventional myocardial infarction, and postinterventional renal replacement therapy as the factors independently associated with an increased one-year mortality. Our findings underscore the significance of a precise preinterventional evaluation, as well as illustrating the subtle differences in baseline characteristics in the TF and TA cohort and their impact on one-year mortality.

Keywords