Cancer Medicine (Jun 2024)

Comprehensive genomic profiling and therapeutic implications for Taiwanese patients with treatment‐naïve breast cancer

  • Shang‐Hung Chen,
  • Ka‐Po Tse,
  • Yen‐Jung Lu,
  • Shu‐Jen Chen,
  • Yu‐Feng Tian,
  • Kien Thiam Tan,
  • Chien‐Feng Li

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7384
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 12
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease categorized based on molecular characteristics, including hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression levels. The emergence of profiling technology has revealed multiple driver genomic alterations within each breast cancer subtype, serving as biomarkers to predict treatment outcomes. This study aimed to explore the genomic landscape of breast cancer in the Taiwanese population through comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and identify diagnostic and predictive biomarkers. Methods Targeted next‐generation sequencing‐based CGP was performed on 116 archived Taiwanese breast cancer specimens, assessing genomic alterations (GAs), including single nucleotide variants, copy number variants, fusion genes, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Predictive variants for FDA‐approved therapies were evaluated within each subtype. Results In the cohort, frequent mutations included PIK3CA (39.7%), TP53 (36.2%), KMT2C (9.5%), GATA3 (8.6%), and SF3B1 (6.9%). All subtypes had low TMB, with no MSI‐H tumors. Among HR + HER2− patients, 42% (27/65) harbored activating PIK3CA mutations, implying potential sensitivity to PI3K inhibitors and resistance to endocrine therapies. HR + HER2− patients exhibited intrinsic hormonal resistance via FGFR1 gene gain/amplification (15%), exclusive of PI3K/AKT pathway alterations. Aberrations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and FGFR pathways were implicated in chemoresistance, with a 52.9% involvement in triple‐negative breast cancer. In HER2+ tumors, 50% harbored GAs potentially conferring resistance to anti‐HER2 therapies, including PIK3CA mutations (32%), MAP3K1 (2.9%), NF1 (2.9%), and copy number gain/amplification of FGFR1 (18%), FGFR3 (2.9%), EGFR (2.9%), and AKT2 (2.9%). Conclusion This study presents CGP findings for treatment‐naïve Taiwanese breast cancer, emphasizing its value in routine breast cancer management, disease classification, and treatment selection.

Keywords