Frontiers in Oncology (Jul 2023)

Prognostic scoring system based on eosinophil- and basophil-related markers for predicting the prognosis of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

  • Lijing Gao,
  • Chao Yuan,
  • Jinming Fu,
  • Tian Tian,
  • Hao Huang,
  • Lei Zhang,
  • Dapeng Li,
  • Yupeng Liu,
  • Shuhan Meng,
  • Ying Liu,
  • Yuanyuan Zhang,
  • Jing Xu,
  • Chenyang Jia,
  • Ding Zhang,
  • Ting Zheng,
  • Qingzhen Fu,
  • Shiheng Tan,
  • Li Lan,
  • Chao Yang,
  • Yashuang Zhao,
  • Yanlong Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1182944
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundSystemic inflammation is associated with the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). The current study aimed to construct a comprehensively inflammatory prognostic scoring system named risk score (RS) based on eosinophil- and basophil-related markers and assess its prognostic value in patients with stage II and stage III CRC.Patients and methodsA total of 3,986 patients were enrolled from January 2007 to December 2013. The last follow-up time was January 2019. They were randomly assigned to the training set and testing set in a 3:2 split ratio. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)–Cox regression analysis was performed to select the optimal prognostic factors in the construction of RS. The Kaplan–Meier curve, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and Cox analysis were used to evaluate the association between RS and overall survival (OS).ResultsIn the training set, all inflammatory markers showed certain prognostic values. Based on LASSO-Cox analysis, nine markers were integrated to construct RS. The Kaplan–Meier curve showed that a higher RS (RS > 0) had a significantly worse prognosis (log-rank p< 0.0001). RS (>0) remained an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR): 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43–2.03, p< 0.001). The prognostic value of RS was validated in the entire cohort. Time-dependent ROC analysis showed that RS had a stable prognostic effect throughout the follow-up times and could enhance the prognostic ability of the stage by combination. Nomogram was established based on RS and clinicopathological factors for predicting OS in the training set and validated in the testing set. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the 3-year OS in the training and testing sets were 0.748 and 0.720, respectively. The nomogram had a satisfactory predictive accuracy and had better clinical application value than the tumor stage alone.ConclusionsRS might be an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with stage II and III CRC, which is helpful for risk stratification of patients. Additionally, the nomogram might be used for personalized prediction and might contribute to formulating a better clinical treatment plan.

Keywords